Hello everyone!
       I'm Lin.  Sorry to post late; I don't have internet at home.  I earned my MA from the U of I in TESL 2009 and my PhD in Linguistics in 2013. My areas of interest are L2 writing and pronunciation, phonology and Swahili.  I don't fancy myself a writer, but I enjoy writing about my experiences in nature. I've been teaching full time in ESL programs since 2014, and I had the chance to teach a rhetoric class last semester.
       I love hunting (deer, pheasants, turkey, ducks, geese, rabbits etc.)  I ate a groundhog once, but I wouldn't really recommend it. I fish as long as there's open water, and I switch to ice fishing when the ice is good. I'm a novice beekeeper, though in a moment of hubris this spring I thought I was more advanced and then had to teach all my classes with half my face the size of a zeppelin.
      Over break I spent a lot of time working Skipjack, my 10 month Brittany pup.  This was his first pheasant season, and by the end he was slightly more of an asset than a liability. Watching him work is one of my greatest joys.
      I'm looking forward to meeting everyone today!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Emi 03/27

These two case studies consider two different research methods that will inevitably lead to very different discussions and presentation of the ideas.  T he non-fiction case study (Lorraine) is purely qualitative, while the academic case study (Fei) is a mixed methods study in which qualitative data is quantitized and the rest of the collected qualitative data (e.g. interview) mainly serves to enhance legitimation. These two different focus, qualitative (Lorraine) and Mixed methods with a focus on quantitative (Fei) are well accepted in research. However, the way that readers approach them may be very different. The qualitative (non-fiction) case study is more engaging, more relatable, and easier to read. As promoted in Qualitative research, the authors present the data as if it were a story and include very detailed anecdotes (called vignettes) that represent the main point to be conveyed. The study is not replicable, but the authors do provide additional information to ensure...
Read more

post 2/27

I found strategies like Show that All Texts Reflect the Author's Frame of Reference and Thus are Subject to Interrogation and Analysis  and Writing 'Translations' particularly helpful for my students who struggle to delineate form from content in their assigned readings. They carry this confusion into their writing by either making clear arguments without providing adequate context, or mimicking the convoluted syntax of academic writing instead of articulating in terms clearest to them what they mean. One question I have is, what are some resources we can point students to help them parse through academic jargon (especially when their instructors have not provided them this resource/ training in class)? Are there existing "Reading guides" online like those described on p.141?
Read more

Writing to Learn, Learning to Write

I'm familiar with different approaches in different contexts. As an instructor, I'm most familiar with learning to write, because even my content-based assignments receive extensive writing attention. As a student, though, I was and am more familiar with writing to learn. But I'm still displeased that as a student in English at the undergraduate, MA, and PhD levels, there was/is not more attention placed on learning to write. At this stage, this seems to be something professors take for granted. (I was recently told: "That's not how you title a dissertation chapter." And I responded: "Can you please tell me how you title a book chapter? I have never done this.") I think also in liberal arts required courses, writing to learn is prioritized in many (most?) disciplines. I'm not particularly persuaded by one form over another, though I have never succeeded in writing to learn language models. But I am partial to the idea that learning to write sho...
Read more