Post for 2/20
I found Lape’s discussion of negotiated interactions to be
very helpful. I was, like many of my classmates I think, wondering what
toggling between Higher Order and Lower Order Concerns would look like in
practice. I had imagined it like a somewhat messy conversation between
distracted people, but when Lape described a negotiated interaction between
student and tutor, it began to make sense. I saw how discussion about word
choice—creer verses praticiper in her example—could be both a grammar and usage
conversation as well as one about the ideas in the text that student and tutor
are discussing. It made me think about the moments in my own tutoring sessions
when I end up focusing on one word or sentence construction because I have a
feeling that it will help me and the student come to an understanding about the
paper.
I have not had a clear moment of cross-cultural rhetorics in
my tutoring so far, since both of my students are native English speaking
undergrads. Although, if you consider academic writing to be a different
culture than casual writing, then I suppose we have had some conversations
about words that fit better in different contexts. I very much appreciate Brice’s
narrative. It was helpful to learn that not everyone feels the same way about
thesis statements. In Philip’s mind, thesis statements—because they foreshadow
events—could be considered insensitive and clumsy.
Comments
Post a Comment